Llanos et al v. Molina et al
| Jose Martin Llanos, Erica Isabel Llanos, Jose (I) Martin Llanos and Erica (I) Isabel Llanos |
| City of Fountain, Eric Moore, Brett Fouts, Brian Anthony Cristiani, Tori Smith, Tori (I) Smith, Raul Jiaan Molina, Eric (I) Moore, Brett (I) Fouts, Alan L. Smith, Alan (I) L. Smith, Brian (I) Anthony Cristiani and Tori Slater |
| 1:2026cv03022 |
| July 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| S Kato Crews |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 SUMMONS issued by Clerk re #12 Summons Request and #13 Summons Request. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (eluce, ) |
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER granting #14 Motion to Vacate and Reset the Deadline for the Proposed Scheduling Order. The Proposed Scheduling Order deadline is extended through October 5, 2026. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 8/20/2026. Text Only Entry(mdblc6.)
|
|
Filing 15
MEMORANDUM regarding #14 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Scheduling Order filed by Jose Martin Llanos, Jose (I) Martin Llanos, Erica (I) Isabel Llanos, Erica Isabel Llanos. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 8/20/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 14 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Scheduling Order by Plaintiffs Erica Isabel Llanos, Erica (I) Isabel Llanos, Jose (I) Martin Llanos, Jose Martin Llanos. (Jones, Jenipher) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS REQUEST as to City of Fountain by Plaintiffs Erica Isabel Llanos, Erica (I) Isabel Llanos, Jose (I) Martin Llanos, Jose Martin Llanos. (Jones, Jenipher) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Raul Jiaan Molina by Plaintiffs Erica Isabel Llanos, Erica (I) Isabel Llanos, Jose (I) Martin Llanos, Jose Martin Llanos. (Jones, Jenipher) |
| Filing 11 Administrative Notice: re: #9 and #10 Summons Request. Summonses will not be issued due to incomplete caption. Caption may not indicate "et al"; if counsel attaches a paper with additional parties, the caption must indicate as such using "see attached" or similar language. (Text Only Entry) (agryan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS REQUEST as to City of Fountain by Plaintiffs Erica Isabel Llanos, Erica (I) Isabel Llanos, Jose (I) Martin Llanos, Jose Martin Llanos. (Jones, Jenipher) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Raul Jiaan Molina by Plaintiffs Erica Isabel Llanos, Erica (I) Isabel Llanos, Jose (I) Martin Llanos, Jose Martin Llanos. (Jones, Jenipher) |
| Filing 8 Administrative Notice: re #7 Summons Request. Summons will not be issued due to incomplete caption. Each summons request shall include the full caption or an attachment with all parties listed. (Text Only Entry) (echa, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS REQUEST as to City of Fountain by Plaintiffs Erica Isabel Llanos, Erica (I) Isabel Llanos, Jose (I) Martin Llanos, Jose Martin Llanos. (Jones, Jenipher) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 8/24/2026. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 7/22/2026. (evaug)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE ENCOURAGING CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This district's magistrate judges play a crucial role in the work and structure of the district court and the administration of justice. Under Local Rule 72.2, the parties have the option to consent to their case being presided over by a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. This court encourages parties to meaningfully confer and consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. There are many benefits to consenting. One such benefit is having a single judicial officer preside over every aspect of your case rather than two. A second benefit is the certainty of not having your trial date vacated when set before a magistrate judge. District judges preside over felony criminal cases and those cases receive priority over civil cases because of a criminal defendant's speedy trial rights. Magistrate judges do not preside over felony criminal cases, and therefore, they do not have to vacate civil trials because of criminal cases. If the parties do not choose to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, they should keep in mind Local Rule 72.3. Under this rule, the parties may consent to the final determination of a dispositive motion (motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss) by the assigned magistrate judge by filing a notice of consent for that motion. Please refer to Local Rule 72.3 for more information on that option. Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is voluntary, and no adverse consequence will result if one or more parties decline to consent. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 7/8/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 7/8/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jberr, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Fountain, Brian Anthony Cristiani, Brett Fouts, Raul Jiann Molina, Eric Moore, Alan Smith, Tori Smith (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11121610)Attorney Jenipher R. Jones added to party Erica Isabel Llanos(pty:pla), Attorney Jenipher R. Jones added to party Jose Martin Llanos (pty:pla), Attorney Jenipher R. Jones added to party THE ESTATE OF TATIANA ISABEL LLANOS(pty:pla), filed by THE ESTATE OF TATIANA ISABEL LLANOS, Jose Martin Llanos, Erica Isabel Llanos.(Jones, Jenipher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
