Ruede v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Tamara D. Ruede |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| SSA Noticing, SSAOGCOMMS and USAO-SS-Noticing |
| 1:2026cv03076 |
| July 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Administrative Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to the Letter of Agreement signed by the Clerk of the U.S. District Court, U.S. Attorneys Office for the District of Colorado (USAO), and Social Security Administration (SSA), service of the initiating document(s) by the plaintiff to the SSA, the U.S. Attorney General, and USAO in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) is not necessary unless the court otherwise orders. A summons is not required and will not be issued. (Text Only Entry) (manoe, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jennifer Latstetter Dunn on behalf of Tamara D. Ruede (Dunn, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11131013)Attorney Jennifer Latstetter Dunn added to party Tamara D. Ruede(pty:pla), filed by Tamara D. Ruede. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A to Complaint - Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dunn, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
