Reuter (PS) v. Ace Hardware et al
| Dianna Grace Reuter |
| Ace Hardware, Axis Health System, Bank of Colorado, Bank of the West, BMO Harris Bank, Citizens Bank, Home Loan State Bank, Timberline Bank and Vectra Bank |
| 1:2026cv03124 |
| July 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RECORD ON APPEAL filed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Dianna Grace Reuter. Volume I - Pleadings; (USCA Case No. 26-1315). Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
| Filing 13 LETTER Transmitting to US Court of Appeals Supplemental Preliminary Record as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Dianna Grace Reuter. (USCA Case No. 26-1315) (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Record)(agryan) |
Filing 12
ORDER Denying Motion for Reconsideration. It is ordered that the Plaintiff's Rule 60 Motion (ECF No. #9 ), which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), is denied, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 08/13/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(agryan)
|
Filing 11
ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Dianna Grace Reuter. (USCA Case No. 26-1315). This appeal is ABATED. When the dispositive order is entered by the district court, the clerk of the district court is directed to supplement the preliminary record in accordance with 10th Cir. R. 3.2(B). (agryan)
|
| Filing 10 USCA Case Number 26-1315 for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Dianna Grace Reuter. (agryan) |
| Filing 8 LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Dianna Grace Reuter to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid and 1915 motion not filed, IFP status on appeal denied in final order,) (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Record and Docket Sheet)(echa, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Order Dismissing Case, #6 Clerk's Judgment by Plaintiff Dianna Grace Reuter. (echa, ) |
| Filing 9 RULE 60 MOTION by Plaintiff Dianna Grace Reuter. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(agryan) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Clerk on 07/15/2026 re: #5 Order of Dismissal. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (agryan) |
Filing 5
ORDER of Dismissal. It is ordered that the Motion to Request Leave to File Action (ECF No. #1 ) is denied. The action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Ms. Reuter failed to comply with the sanction order restricting her ability to file pro se actions in the District of Colorado, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 07/15/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (agryan)
|
| Filing 4 RULE 60 MOTION by Plaintiff Dianna Grace Reuter. (agryan) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION of Harmless Error by Plaintiff Dianna Grace Reuter. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Request Leave to File Action, Receipt Number: 118730 Filing fee: $405, by Plaintiff Dianna Grace Reuter. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document, #2 Envelope, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Receipt)(dhern, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.