Sao v. Baltazar et al
| Abdoul Sao |
| Juan Baltazar, George Valdez, Markwayne Mullin, David J Venturella and Todd Blanche |
| 1:2026cv03152 |
| July 14, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| William J Martinez |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (manoe, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry. (manoe, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Mary Jo Highland on behalf of Abdoul SaoAttorney Mary Jo Highland added to party Abdoul Sao(pty:pet) (Highland, Mary Jo) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Petitioner Abdoul Sao. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(Meyer, Hans) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Hans Christopher Meyer on behalf of Abdoul Sao (Meyer, Hans) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11139951)Attorney Hans Christopher Meyer added to party Abdoul Sao(pty:pet), filed by Abdoul Sao. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Meyer, Hans) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.