Guillen Acosta v. Baltazar et al
| Alice Guillen Acosta |
| Juan Baltazar, George Valdez, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella and Todd Blanche |
| 1:2026cv03166 |
| July 15, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (eguth, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Hans Christopher Meyer on behalf of Alice Guillen AcostaAttorney Hans Christopher Meyer added to party Alice Guillen Acosta(pty:pet) (Meyer, Hans) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Petitioner Alice Guillen Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. 1, #2 Exhibit Exh. 2, #3 Exhibit Exh. 3, #4 Exhibit Exh. 4, #5 Exhibit Exh. 5, #6 Exhibit Exh. 6, #7 Exhibit Exh. 7, #8 Exhibit Exh. 8)(Ziesemer, Jodi) |
| Filing 1 First APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11142630)Attorney Jodi Ellen Ziesemer added to party Alice Guillen Acosta(pty:pet), filed by Alice Guillen Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Ziesemer, Jodi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
