Cooper v. Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC
| Sue Cooper |
| Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC |
| 1:2026cv03172 |
| July 15, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Cyrus Y Chung |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to 14 Minute Order to dismiss filed in this case on 9/9/2026. Text Only Entry (ggill, ) |
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court on the #13 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Lorrie Sierra Without Prejudice filed by Plaintiff, which is a self-effectuating notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the #13 Notice, Plaintiff "gives notice of the voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice." Plaintiff's claims were dismissed as of the filing of the Notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case accordingly. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/9/2026. Text Only Entry (nywlc10, )
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case Without Prejudice by Plaintiff Sue Cooper (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Proposed Order)(Wells, Robert Bruce) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the Parties by motion, this Court may direct the Parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at his discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/8/2026. Text Only Entry (nywlc10, )
|
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang for all further proceedings. Judge R. Brooke Jackson is no longer assigned to case. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-03172-NYW. (ccuen, ) |
| Filing 10 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (agryan) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court sua sponte. On July 17, 2026, the Court set a September 2, 2026 deadline for the parties to file the Consent Form. ECF No. #4 . No Consent Form has been filed. Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to REASSIGN this case under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a). This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1(c). (This case is randomly reassigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson, and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung no longer for all future proceedings. All parties do not consent All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-03172-RBJ). Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
|
Filing 8
Minute Order: The Joint Motion Requesting an Extension of Time for Defendant Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC to Respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint, ECF No. #7 , is GRANTED for good cause shown. The defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. #1 , on or before October 30, 2026. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 9/1/2026. Text Only Entry (spric)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Lueck, Dennis) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC. Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC answer due 8/31/2026. (Lueck, Dennis) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sue Cooper. Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC served on 7/20/2026, answer due 8/10/2026. (Wells, Robert Bruce) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER: The Parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form, ECF No. 3-1, on or before September 2, 2026. It is further ORDERED that the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference will be held before this Court on September 16, 2026 at 11:15 a.m. in Courtroom C-201, on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall notify all Parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Scheduling Conference. The Parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerk's Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures, no later than seven days prior to the scheduling conference. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to be submitted in Word format by email to Magistrate Judge Chung at [email protected]. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 07/17/2026. (agryan)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (alxu, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry. (alxu, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11144164)Attorney Robert Bruce Grayson Kent Wells added to party Sue Cooper(pty:pla), filed by Sue Cooper. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Wells, Robert Bruce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cooper v. Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sue Cooper | |
| Represented By: | Robert Bruce Grayson Kent Wells |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, PLLC | |
| Represented By: | Dennis N. Lueck, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
