Smith v. Target Corporation
| Kelly Smith |
| Target Corporation |
| 1:2026cv03375 |
| July 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Cyrus Y Chung |
| S Kato Crews |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
Minute Order: This matter is before on correspondence from the parties. The Scheduling Conference set for October 13, 2026 at 10:45 a.m. is RESET to October 21, 2026 at 11:15 a.m. in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung.It is further ORDERED that counsel for the Parties and any unrepresented non-prisoner Parties in this case are to hold a meeting in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before September 30, 2026 and jointly prepare a proposed Scheduling Order. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d), only requests pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 may be submitted before the Rule 26(f) meeting, unless otherwise ordered or directed by the Court. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(b)(2)(A), responses to such discovery requests must be submitted no later than thirty days after the Rule 26(f) meeting, unless the Parties stipulate or the Court orders otherwise.The Proposed Scheduling Order is due on or before October 14, 2026. The Parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerks Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Procedures. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to be submitted in Word format by email to Magistrate Judge Chung at [email protected].. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 9/22/2026. Text Only Entry (spric)
|
| Filing 24 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Target Corporation All parties do not consent.. (Bell, Lori) |
|
Filing 23
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 09/01/2026. (agryan)
|
|
Filing 22
MINUTE ORDER: Before the Court is the parties' Joint Motion for Entry of Protective Order, ECF No. #20 , and the proposed protective order, ECF No. 20-1. For good cause, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion for Entry of Protective Order, ECF No. #20 . The Court will separately issue the protective order. The Court has made modifications as indicated in the attached redlined version. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 09/01/2026. (Attachments: #1 Redlined Version)(agryan)
|
|
Filing 21
MEMORANDUM regarding #20 Stipulated MOTION for Protective Order filed by Target Corporation. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 8/27/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 20 Stipulated MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Ostrowski, Taylor) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 8/14/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 18 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to #17 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Case randomly reassigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung for all future proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-03375-SKC. (Text Only Entry) (eluce) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The defendant demonstrates that the plaintiff's negligence claim is precluded as a matter of law and, as such, the Court RECOMMENDS that the unopposed motion, ECF No. #15 , be GRANTED and that the plaintiff's negligence claim be dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is hereby ORDERED to REASSIGN this case to a District Judge after docketing this recommendation. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 8/11/2026. (eluce)
|
| Filing 16 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER to #7 Complaint and Jury Demand by Target Corporation.(Bell, Lori) |
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Negligence Claim by Defendant Target Corporation. (Ostrowski, Taylor) |
|
Filing 14
Minute Order: The defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. #13 , is GRANTED for good cause shown. The defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. #7 , on or before August 6, 2026. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 8/4/2026. Text Only Entry (spric)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Target Corporation. (Ostrowski, Taylor) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Stephen Roberts on behalf of Kelly SmithAttorney Stephen Roberts added to party Kelly Smith(pty:pla) (Roberts, Stephen) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER: The above captioned case has been directly assigned to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1. The Parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form, ECF No. #10 , on or before September 29, 2026. It is further ORDERED that the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference will be held before this Court on October 13, 2026 at 10:45 a.m. in Courtroom C-201, on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall notify all Parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Scheduling Conference. The Parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerk's Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures, no later than seven days prior to the scheduling conference. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to be submitted in Word format by email to Magistrate Judge Chung at [email protected]. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 7/28/2026. (eluce)
|
| Filing 10 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (jberr, ) |
| Filing 9 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) |
| Filing 8 Service of Process Transmittal Summary of Summons to Defendant Target Corporation, District Court Civil (CS) Case Cover Sheet for Initial Pleading of Complaint, Counterclaim, Cross-Claim or Third-Party Complaint and Jury Demand, Complaint and Jury Demand upon Target Corporation on July 7, 2026. (jberr, ) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Target Corporation, filed by Kelly Smith. (jberr, ) |
| Filing 6 ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE to filer of non-compliance with Notice of Removal case opening procedures. Pursuant to Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1, and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a, each of the state court documents shall be individual PDFs. See Appendix B Notice of Removal in the User Guide - Attorney Case Opening Procedures document. (Text Only Entry.) (jberr, ) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jberr, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Lori Kathryn Bell on behalf of Target CorporationAttorney Lori Kathryn Bell added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft) (Bell, Lori) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Ostrowski, Taylor) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing of State Court Docket Sheet by Defendant Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - State Court Docket Sheet)(Ostrowski, Taylor) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from Kelly Smith v. Target Corporation, Case Number 2026cv32397. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-11167029), filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - CO SOS Summary, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Service of Process, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Other Filings, #6 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Ostrowski, Taylor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelly Smith | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Roberts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Taylor G. Ostrowski |
| Represented By: | Lori Kathryn Bell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
