Brehm v. Ware
| Kathleen Brehm |
| George Randall Ware |
| 1:2026cv03408 |
| July 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Timothy P O'Hara |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Bradley Don Tucker on behalf of Kathleen BrehmAttorney Bradley Don Tucker added to party Kathleen Brehm(pty:pla) (Tucker, Bradley) |
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 7/28/2026. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
|
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (eguth, ) |
| Filing 7 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against George Randall Ware, filed by Kathleen Brehm.(eguth, ) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 3 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by attorney Kristen Balcom. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through PACER pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by attorney Gabriel T. Cutter and Gregory Scott Rich. The s/signature did not match the filer name on the account for which the login and password are registered. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(c) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by George Randall Ware Notice of Removal from DISTRICT COURT, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, Case Number 2026cv030098. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number BCODC-11169845), filed by George Randall Ware. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - 26.06.04 Complaint and Jury Demand, #3 Exhibit B - 26.07.23 Ware Removal Affidavit - Signed, #4 Exhibit C - 26.06.04 CV Cover Sheet for Initial Pleading of Complaint Counterclaim Cross Claim or Third_Party_Complaint, #5 Exhibit D - Waiver-Acceptance of Service, #6 Exhibit E - 26.06.04 District Court Civil Summons, #7 Exhibit F - 26.06.09 Delay Reduction Order)(Rich, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brehm v. Ware | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kathleen Brehm | |
| Represented By: | Bradley Don Tucker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: George Randall Ware | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Scott Rich |
| Represented By: | Kristen A. Balcom |
| Represented By: | Gabriel Thomas Cutter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
