Hyde v. Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. et al
| Ryan Hyde |
| Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. and Monarch Black Hawk, Inc. |
| 1:2026cv03505 |
| August 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| R Brooke Jackson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Consent by Plaintiff Ryan Hyde (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent)(Parmet, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Matthew Scott Parmet on behalf of Ryan HydeAttorney Matthew Scott Parmet added to party Ryan Hyde(pty:pla) (Parmet, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Administrative Notice: Duplicate filing fee received. Financial notified and a refund is pending. (Text Only Entry) (agarc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monarch Black Hawk, Inc., Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11184169)Attorney Don J. Foty added to party Ryan Hyde(pty:pla), Attorney Don J. Foty added to party Ryan (I) Hyde(pty:pla), filed by Ryan Hyde, Ryan (I) Hyde. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc, #3 Summons for Monarch Black Hawk, Inc)(Foty, Don) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.