Sandoval Espinoza v. Baltazar et al
| Joel Anderson Sandoval Espinoza |
| Juan Baltazar, George Valdez, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella and Todd Blanche |
| 1:2026cv03529 |
| August 4, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER. Upon review of the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, it is ORDERED that Petitioner shall SERVE Respondents with a copy of the #1 Petition and #4 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction, and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and overnight mail, on or before 8/6/2026. Petitioner shall promptly file proof of such service on the docket, and counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter their notices of appearance. Within seven days of service, Respondents shall RESPOND to the Motion and SHOW CAUSE why the Petition shall not be granted. See, e.g., Yassine v. Collins, No. 1:25-cv-00786-ADA-SH, 2025 WL 1954064, at *1 (W.D. Tex. July 7, 2025) (explaining that while 2243 refers to a three day deadline, this requirement is "subordinate to the district court's authority to set deadlines" itself, and granting respondents a fourteen day deadline to respond in order to "give [r]espondents adequate time to brief the issues" (quotations omitted)). Pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. 1651(a), and in order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction, Respondents SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado or the United States unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. See also Vizguerra-Ramirez v. Choate, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-881, D. Colo., ECF No. 11 at 45 (collecting cases); F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 603 (1966); Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n v. New York Shipping Assn, 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992). SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 8/4/2026. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Hans Christopher Meyer on behalf of Joel Anderson Sandoval EspinozaAttorney Hans Christopher Meyer added to party Joel Anderson Sandoval Espinoza(pty:pet) (Meyer, Hans) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (eguth, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Petitioner Joel Anderson Sandoval Espinoza. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit)(Quezada-Villa, Anahi) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Cases by Petitioner Joel Anderson Sandoval Espinoza (Quezada-Villa, Anahi) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Anahi Quezada-Villa on behalf of Joel Anderson Sandoval Espinoza (Quezada-Villa, Anahi) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11187245)Attorney Anahi Quezada-Villa added to party Joel Anderson Sandoval Espinoza(pty:pet), filed by Joel Anderson Sandoval Espinoza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Quezada-Villa, Anahi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
