Green et al v. Vail Resorts, Inc. et al
| Nicholas Green, James Douglas and Joseph Goad |
| Vail Resorts, Inc., Alterra Mountain Company, Boyne USA, Inc., d/b/a Boyne Resorts, Powdr Corp., RRC Associates, Inc. and National Ski Areas Association |
| 1:2026cv03555 |
| August 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Cyrus Y Chung |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (alxu, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry. (alxu, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Vail Resorts, Inc., Alterra Mountain Company, Powdr Corp., Boyne USA, Inc. d/b/a Boyne Resorts, RRC Associates Inc., and National Ski Areas Association by Plaintiffs James "Scott&quo Douglas, Joseph Goad, Nicholas Green. (Jalkut, Ellen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11191020)Attorney Ellen G. Jalkut added to party James "Scott&quo Douglas (pty:pla), Attorney Ellen G. Jalkut added to party Joseph Goad(pty:pla), Attorney Ellen G. Jalkut added to party Nicholas Green(pty:pla), filed by James "Scott&quo Douglas, Joseph Goad, Nicholas Green. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jalkut, Ellen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.