Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stellar Path Institute Ltd
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Stellar Path Institute Ltd |
| 1:2026cv03987 |
| August 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| William J Martinez |
| Timothy P O'Hara |
| Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/27/2026. Text Only Entry (wjmja, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/27/2026. Text Only Entry (wjmja, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Stellar Path Institute Ltd re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission. (Foster, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (manoe, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. OHara. Text Only Entry. (manoe, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stellar Path Institute Ltd Attorney Michael D. Foster added to party Securities and Exchange Commission(pty:pla), filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Foster, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stellar Path Institute Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission | |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Foster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stellar Path Institute Ltd | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
