Board of Trustees of the Eighth District Electrical Pension Trust v. Feltis et al
| Board of Trustees of the Eighth District Electrical Pension Trust |
| Mary A Feltis and Chandra Lee Guillen |
| 1:2026cv04002 |
| August 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1332 - ERISA |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mary A Feltis, Chandra Lee Guillen (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11244044)Attorney Eric Christian Beckemeier added to party Board of Trustees of the Eighth District Electrical Pension Trust(pty:pla), filed by Board of Trustees of the Eighth District Electrical Pension Trust. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Chandra Lee Guillen, #3 Summons Mary A. Feltis, #4 Exhibit 1 - Eighth District Electrical Pension Plan, #5 Exhibit 2 - Eighth District Electrical Annuity Plan Restatement, #6 Exhibit 3 - Beneficiary Designation Card, #7 Exhibit 4 - Affidavit of Preference Beneficiary and Supporting Documentation, #8 Exhibit 5 - January 6, 2026 Denial Letter, #9 Exhibit 6 - Appeal Letter, #10 Exhibit 7 - Correspondence dated April 13, 2026, #11 Exhibit 8 - Correspondence dated April 22, 2026, #12 Exhibit 9 - Appeal Denial July 2, 2026)(Beckemeier, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
