USA v. Approximately $4,232.55 in United States Currency Seized From J.P. Morgan Chase Bank Account #613307872
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Approximately $4,232.55 in United States Currency Seized From J.P. Morgan Chase Bank Account #613307872
Case Number: 1:2026cv04108
Filed: September 2, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Referring Judge: Timothy P O'Hara
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by Plaintiff USA (Andrews, Tonya)
September 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other specifically-referred motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court levsponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 9/2/2026. Text Only Entry. (eluce)
September 2, 2026 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (eguth, )
September 2, 2026 Filing 2 Case assigned to District Judge Gordon P Gallagher and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara. Text Only Entry (eguth, )
September 2, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against Approximately $4,232.55 in United States Currency Seized From J.P. Morgan Chase Bank Account #613307872 Attorney Tonya Shotwell Andrews added to party USA(pty:pla), filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only), #2 Warrant for Arrest of Property In Rem, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Andrews, Tonya)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Approximately $4,232.55 in United States Currency Seized From J.P. Morgan Chase Bank Account #613307872
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Tonya Shotwell Andrews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Approximately $4,232.55 in United States Currency Seized From J.P. Morgan Chase Bank Account #613307872
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?