Uzcategui Rojo v. Valdez et al
| Anyely Paola Uzcategui Rojo |
| George Valdez, Markwayne Mullin, Todd Blanche, Todd M. Lyons and Juan Baltazar |
| 1:2026cv04116 |
| September 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (eguth, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by attorney Colleen Cowgill. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through PACER pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11257425)Attorney Colleen Mary Cowgill added to party Anyely Paola Uzcategui Rojo(pty:pet), filed by Anyely Paola Uzcategui Rojo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Petitioner's I-94, #3 Exhibit Notice to Appear)(Cowgill, Colleen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
