KPS Retail LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
| KPS Retail LLC |
| Starbucks Corporation |
| 1:2026cv04191 |
| September 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Cyrus Y. Chung |
| S. Kato Crews |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff KPS Retail LLC. (Mendez, Diana) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Geneus, Jonathan) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration Authenticating Lease, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - KPS Realty v. Starbucks Lease)(Geneus, Jonathan) |
Filing 10
ORDER Pursuant to the recent reassignment of this matter, the parties shall familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order for Civil Cases on the Court's website. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 10/7/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) I recuse myself from further service in this matter; and (2) The Clerk of the Court shall reassign this case to another District Judge. (Case randomly reassigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. All pleadings shall be designated to 26-cv-04191-SKC-CYC). By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/6/2026. (ggill, )
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint #1 , Attorney Jonathan Helmsley Geneus added to party Starbucks Corporation(pty:dft) by Starbucks Corporation.(Geneus, Jonathan) Modified on 10/2/2026 to correct event (agryan). |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to the Order of Reference, this Court will hold the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference on November 18, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. , in Courtroom C-201, on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall notify all Parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Scheduling Conference. The Parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerk's Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures, no later than seven days prior to the scheduling conference. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to be submitted in Word format by email to Magistrate Judge Chung at [email protected]. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 9/21/2026. (eluce )
|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Plaintiff KPS Retail LLC. (Mendez, Diana) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the Parties by motion, this Court may direct the Parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at his discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/9/2026. Text Only Entry (nywlc8, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Mendez, Diana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Starbucks Corporation (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11266748)Attorney Diana Marie Mendez added to party KPS Retail LLC(pty:pla), filed by KPS Retail LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mendez, Diana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KPS Retail LLC v. Starbucks Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KPS Retail LLC | |
| Represented By: | Diana Marie Mendez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Starbucks Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Helmsley Geneus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
