Shilling v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Amanda Eleene Shilling
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2026cv04255
Filed: September 10, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11275018)Attorney Ida M. Comerford added to party Amanda Eleene Shilling(pty:pla), filed by Amanda Eleene Shilling. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Unfavorable Decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Comerford, Ida)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shilling v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Eleene Shilling
Represented By: Ida M. Comerford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?