Sack v. Summit County et al
| Guy R. Sack |
| Summit County, Colorado, Town of Frisco, Colorado, Summit Fire & EMS, Ashley Thomas, Mandi Ryan, Joshua Sprong, Charles Freeman, Brian Ray, Casey Humann, James C Bates, Lane Woods, Thomas Davies and Ted Salthouse |
| 1:2026cv04291 |
| September 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (manoe, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (manoe, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Complaint filed by attorney Guy R. Sack. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through PACER pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (manoe, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11279891)Attorney Guy Richard Sack added to party Guy Richard Sack(pty:pla), filed by Guy Richard Sack. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sack, Guy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
