Midusson v. Baltazar et al
| Wajezi Kakuru Midusson |
| Juan Baltazar, George Valdez and Markwayne Mullin |
| 1:2026cv04556 |
| September 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER: Before the Court is Petitioner Wajezi Kakuru Midusson's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, ECF No. 1, in which Petitioner requests that the Court order Respondents to provide Petitioner with an individualized bond hearing, id. at 35. Having reviewed the petition, the Court ORDERS Petitioner to, no later than two calendar days from the entry of this Order, (1) serve Respondents with copies of the Petition and any accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and mail pursuant to the service requirements outlined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i); and (2) promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter notices of appearance. Within five (5) calendar days of service, Respondents are ORDERED TO RESPOND to the Petition and are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Petition should not be granted. See, e.g., Yassine v. Collins, No. 1:25-cv-00786-ADA-SH, 2025 WL 1954064, at *1 (W.D. Tex. July 7, 2025) (explaining that while 2243 refers to a three day deadline, this requirement is "subordinate to the district court's authority to set deadlines" itself, and granting respondents a fourteen day deadline to respond in order to "give [r]espondents adequate time to brief the issues" (quotations omitted)). Further, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. 1651(a), and in order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction, Respondents SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado or the United States unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. See also Vizguerra-Ramirez v. Choate, et. al, Case No. 1:25-cv-881, D. Colo., ECF No. 11 at 45 (collecting cases); F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 603 (1966); Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n v. New York Shipping Ass'n, 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992). By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 9/16/2026. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11290271)Attorney James D. Jenkins added to party Wajezi Kakuru Midusson(pty:pet), filed by Wajezi Kakuru Midusson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. A - Bond Decision, #2 Exhibit Exh. B - Declaration of Dr. Laura Ramzy, #3 Exhibit Exh. C - U visa receipts, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jenkins, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
