G.A. v. Baltazar et al
| K. J. G.A. |
| Juan Baltazar, George Valdez, David Venturella, Markwayne Mullin and Todd Blanche |
| 1:2026cv04560 |
| September 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry. (manoe, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym by Petitioner K. J. G.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1: Estigma en Salud Mental, with English Translation)(Lipson, Austin) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number BCODC-11291192)Attorney Austin David Lipson added to party K. J. G.A.(pty:pet), filed by K. J. G.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet for 1:26-cv-4560, #2 Exhibit Notice of Action Granting TPS, #3 Exhibit Letter Confirming Membership of National TPS Alliance, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3: Employment Authorization Card, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4: Record of Petitioner's Encounter with ICE Health Services Corps, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5: Petitioner's Case Information as Provided by the Executive Office for Immigration Review)(Lipson, Austin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
