Buckle (PS) v. Baltazar

Buckle (PS) v. Baltazar

Petitioner:	Machelle Anthony Buckle
Respondent:	Juan Baltazar
Case Number:	1:2026cv04647
Filed:	September 21, 2026
Court:	U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 1, 2026	Filing 8 Memorandum Opinion and ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. 1 ] is GRANTED; (2) Respondent shall provide Petitioner a constitutionally adequate bond hearing no later than October 8, 2026. At the bond hearing, the Government shall bear the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that Petitioner's continued detention is justified. If Respondent does not provide Petitioner with a constitutionally adequate bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) as required herein, Petitioner must be immediately released from detention; (3) On or before October 15, 2026, Respondent shall file a status report concerning (1) the re sults of any bond hearing that was conducted or, if no hearing was held, the date Petitioner was released from custody; and (2) whether any additional proceedings in this matter are required; and (4) A copy of this Order shall be sent to Petitioner at his address of record. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/1/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ggill, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 1, 2026

Filing 8 Memorandum Opinion and ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. 1 ] is GRANTED; (2) Respondent shall provide Petitioner a constitutionally adequate bond hearing no later than October 8, 2026. At the bond hearing, the Government shall bear the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that Petitioner's continued detention is justified. If Respondent does not provide Petitioner with a constitutionally adequate bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) as required herein, Petitioner must be immediately released from detention; (3) On or before October 15, 2026, Respondent shall file a status report concerning (1) the re sults of any bond hearing that was conducted or, if no hearing was held, the date Petitioner was released from custody; and (2) whether any additional proceedings in this matter are required; and (4) A copy of this Order shall be sent to Petitioner at his address of record. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/1/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ggill, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buckle (PS) v. Baltazar
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Machelle Anthony Buckle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Juan Baltazar
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?