Wess v. Colorado Access et al
| Rodney Wess |
| Colorado Access and Access Management Services, LLC |
| 1:2026cv04749 |
| September 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Kathryn A Starnella |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
PRE-SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER. Entered by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 9/25/2026. (echa, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) shall be held on December 14, 2026, commencing at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, Fifth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. No later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the Scheduling/Planning Conference, counsel and pro se parties shall submit their proposed Scheduling Order in compliance with the Court's Electronic Case Filing Procedures, which are also available on the Court's website. Entered by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 9/25/2026. (Attachments: #1 Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order, #2 Proposed Scheduling Order) (echa, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Additionally, the parties are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Uniform Civil Practice Standards of both judicial officers assigned to this case which can be found #here. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 9/25/26. Text Only Entry (jdyne, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Gwendolyn M. Lawson. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through PACER pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Colorado Access, Access Management Services, LLC (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11314312)Attorney Gwendolyn M. Lawson added to party Rodney Wess(pty:pla), filed by Rodney Wess. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons, #3 Summons Summons)(Lawson, Gwendolyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
