Ordonez Bastidas v. Baltazar et al
Petitioner: Diego Fernando Ordonez Bastidas
Respondent: Juan Baltazar, David Venturella, Markwayne Mullin and Todd Blanche
Case Number: 1:2026cv05298
Filed: October 18, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Cyrus Y Chung
Referring Judge: Daniel D Domenico
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to provide notice of this case and a copy of #1 Verified Petition for Habeas Corpus and this Order by email to the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado.Having reviewed the petition, the Court finds that good cause appears, and it is therefore ORDERED that the respondents must SHOW CAUSE within one week of such notice why the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. If the respondents file a non-substantive response that does not explain why the application should not be granted, the Court will order them to immediately release the petitioner from detention. If the respondents do not file any response by the deadline, they must release the petitioner from detention no later than twenty-four hours after the response deadline, and they must file a status report within one week of the response deadline confirming the petitioner has been released.The petitioner may file a reply within one week of service of any response.SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 10/19/2026. Text Only Entry (sphil, )
October 19, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 10/19/2026. Text Only Entry. (rkeec)
October 18, 2026 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry (eguth, )
October 18, 2026 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11368897)Attorney Emily McDonnell added to party Diego Fernando Ordonez Bastidas(pty:pet), filed by Diego Fernando Ordonez Bastidas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit ECAS Motion to Reopen Filing Confirmation, #2 Exhibit I-130 and I-485 Receipts, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(McDonnell, Emily)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ordonez Bastidas v. Baltazar et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Diego Fernando Ordonez Bastidas
Represented By: Emily McDonnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Juan Baltazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Venturella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Markwayne Mullin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Todd Blanche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?