Blue Springs Ford, Inc. et al v. ONEFLIGHT JETS, INC. D/B/A ONEFLIGHT INTERNATIONAL et al
| Bob Balderston and Blue Springs Ford, Inc. |
| GABRIEL LOPEZ, Mark Dismuke, FERREN RAJPUT, ONEFLIGHT INTERNATIONAL, INC., D/B/A BAJIT, BALCC HOLDINGS, LLC D/B/A ONEFLIGHT INTERNATIONAL and ONEFLIGHT JETS, INC. D/B/A ONEFLIGHT INTERNATIONAL |
| 1:2026cv06109 |
| November 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Contract: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11443090)Attorney Nathan Kent Davis added to party Bob Balderston(pty:pla), Attorney Nathan Kent Davis added to party Blue Springs Ford, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Bob Balderston, Blue Springs Ford, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet USDC Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Sapphire Club Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - 25-hr Jetcard Membership Agreement, #4 Summons Proposed Summons ONEflight Jets, Inc. d/b/a ONEflight International, #5 Summons Proposed Summons BALCC Holdings, LLC d/b/a ONEflight International, #6 Summons Proposed Summons ONEflight International, Inc. d/b/a BAJIT, #7 Summons Proposed Summons Ferren Rajput, #8 Summons Proposed Summons Mark Dismuke)(Davis, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
