Elliot v. Pratt & Whitney
Andrew R. Elliot |
Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, Div. Of United Tech Corp. |
3:1999cv01290 |
September 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Ellen Bree Burns |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
No cause code entered |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 Ruling and ORDER denying 119 Motion to Disqualify Judge; denying 119 Motion for Settlement; denying 119 Motion for reassignment to an impartial Judge. Signed by Judge Ellen Bree Burns on 9/16/2009. (Falcone, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Elliot v. Pratt & Whitney | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Andrew R. Elliot | |
Represented By: | Christine M. Ellis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, Div. Of United Tech Corp. | |
Represented By: | Sarah Moore Fass |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.