Elliot v. Pratt & Whitney
Plaintiff: Andrew R. Elliot
Defendant: Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, Div. Of United Tech Corp.
Case Number: 3:1999cv01290
Filed: September 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
Presiding Judge: Ellen Bree Burns
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: No cause code entered

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 120 Ruling and ORDER denying 119 Motion to Disqualify Judge; denying 119 Motion for Settlement; denying 119 Motion for reassignment to an impartial Judge. Signed by Judge Ellen Bree Burns on 9/16/2009. (Falcone, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elliot v. Pratt & Whitney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew R. Elliot
Represented By: Christine M. Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, Div. Of United Tech Corp.
Represented By: Sarah Moore Fass
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?