Edelman v. Page, et al
| 3:2000cv01166 |
| June 22, 2000 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Dominic J. Squatrito |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1981 Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
378
For the reasons stated in the attached order, plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. # 377 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/27/2018. (Gondwe, N.)
|
|
Filing
376
ORDER DENYING POST-JUDGMENT MOTION FOR RELIEF. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, plaintiff's motion for relief (Doc. # 368 ) is denied.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 7/16/2018. (Gondwe, N.)
|
|
Filing
322
ORDER. Schultz's motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 251 ) is GRANTED, and judgment shall enter in his favor on all remaining claims against him. The Clerk of Court shall dismiss Donald Schultz as a defendant in this case. Page's motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 250 ) is GRANTED as to the claims of false arrest, denial of due process, and denial of equal protection of the laws, and DENIED as to the claim of malicious prosecution. See attached. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/25/2015. (Ramesh, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Edelman v. Page, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
