Amara v. CIGNA Corp, et al
| 3:2001cv02361 |
| December 19, 2001 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Mark R. Kravitz |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
636
ORDER. For the reasons described in the attached Ruling, Plaintiffs' motion for accounting and/or post-judgment discovery, ECF No. 614 , and Plaintiffs' motion to strike, ECF No. 629 , are DENIED. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 5/6/2024. (Hagemann, E)
|
|
Filing
606
ORDER denying 591 Motion for Accounting. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 8/6/20. (Gutierrez, A.)
|
|
Filing
588
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 580 Motion for Reconsideration of 579 Enforcement Order. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/10/20. (Gutierrez, A.)
|
|
Filing
579
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs' 571 Motion to Enforce Judgment. The Court directs Defendants to pay small benefit cashouts to participants who have not received their Part B cash balance accounts as promptly as possible and denies the Motion in all other respects. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply 575 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 8/16/2019. (Kolker, J.)
|
|
Filing
555
ORDER: As set forth in the attached ruling, the Court orders that Class Counsel shall be awarded attorney's fees and litigation expenses, excluding expert witness fees and future projected expenses. Defendants shall begin implementing the A+B re medy as quickly as possible. Within 30 days of this ruling, the parties must exchange their individual results for each class member for inclusion in Plaintiffs' website benefit statement and in Cigna's mailed notices. Cigna must mail these notices within 60 days of this ruling, and then pay any past due lump sums and back benefits no later than 30 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 11/29/18. (Kolker, J.)
|
|
Filing
550
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, the Court adopts Plaintiffs' proposed interest rate and age assumption methodologies for the purpose of calculating the net present value of the remedy award and calculating the attorneys& #039; fees to which Plaintiffs may potentially be entitled, and DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion 545 for Leave to File Declaration. Defendant shall provide the Court with an updated net present value calculation in accordance with this Order by Wednesday, November 7, 2018. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/17/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Email Correspondence from the Parties) (Kolker, J.)
|
|
Filing
517
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiffs' Motion 508 for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 11/7/17. (Kolker, J.)
|
|
Filing
485
Ruling on Plaintiff Class's Objections to Cigna's Revised 204(h) Notices. Plaintiffs' Objections 464 are sustained in part and denied in part. Ruling on Proposed Methodology 459 is amended accordingly. Amended Ruling to follow. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/10/17.(Tooker, A.)
|
|
Filing
378
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION granting relief to Plaintiffs, denying Defendants' Motion to Decertify the Class 323 , and denying as moot the parties Joint Motion for Status Conference 376 . Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 12/20/2012. (Lake, G.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Amara v. CIGNA Corp, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
