Fire & Casualty Ins v. Trustmark Ins Co

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit Connecticut District Court Fire & Casualty Ins v. Trustmark Ins Co

Fire & Casualty Ins v. Trustmark Ins Co

Case Number:	3:2003cv01000
Filed:	June 5, 2003
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
Presiding Judge:	Peter C. Dorsey
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2013	Filing 205 ORDER: The Court declines to adopt the Report and Recommendation 199 . Petitioner's motion to enforce the judgment 103 is DENIED, and Respondent's motion to reinstate the July 2009 Order 106 is DENIED as moot, to the extent that Respon dent seeks to reinstate the July 2009 Order, and GRANTED, to the extent that the Court recognizes the 2007 Amended Judgment as the Final Judgment. Respondent's Motion to Strike 108 is also DENIED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 3/29/2013. (Flagg, K.)
May 7, 2012	Filing 170 ORDER: Defendant's Motion 161 to Restore the case to the active docket is GRANTED and Defendant's Motion 162 to Preclude further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions 167 is DENIED, a nd Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt is DENIED without prejudice to renew. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Smith for an evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff's motion to enforce the judgment and report. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 5/7/2012.(Flagg, K.)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2013

Filing 205 ORDER: The Court declines to adopt the Report and Recommendation 199 . Petitioner's motion to enforce the judgment 103 is DENIED, and Respondent's motion to reinstate the July 2009 Order 106 is DENIED as moot, to the extent that Respon dent seeks to reinstate the July 2009 Order, and GRANTED, to the extent that the Court recognizes the 2007 Amended Judgment as the Final Judgment. Respondent's Motion to Strike 108 is also DENIED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 3/29/2013. (Flagg, K.)

May 7, 2012

Filing 170 ORDER: Defendant's Motion 161 to Restore the case to the active docket is GRANTED and Defendant's Motion 162 to Preclude further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions 167 is DENIED, a nd Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt is DENIED without prejudice to renew. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Smith for an evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff's motion to enforce the judgment and report. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 5/7/2012.(Flagg, K.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fire & Casualty Ins v. Trustmark Ins Co
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?