McClain v. Pfizer Inc
| 3:2006cv01795 |
| November 7, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Contract: Other |
| No cause code entered |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
289
CORRECTED ORDER re 288 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 9/6/13.(Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
|
Filing
270
ORDER denying 249 defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or to Amend the Judgment, and granting 238 plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Punitive Damages. See the attached memorandum of decision. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 6/27/11. (Wilson, J.)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER granting the Plaintiff's 179 Motion in Limine to preclude the OSHA decision and Department of Public Health investigation and report. See attached memorandum of decision. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 3/1/10. (Johnson, J.)
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER granting in part and denying in part the Defendant's 134 Motion for Summary Judgment. See attached Memorandum of Decision. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 2/26/10. (Johnson, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McClain v. Pfizer Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
