Parillo et al v. FKI Plc et al
| Stefan Lepczynski, Catherine Cox, James N. Parillo, Theodore E. Storlazzi and United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Mfg Energy Allied Indus & Svc Workers Intl Union AFL-CIO CLC |
| FKI Industries, Inc |
| 3:2007cv00414 |
| March 15, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Employee Pension Plan |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
Final Judgment, dismissing class action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 12/22/2009. (Kretman, J.) Modified on 12/23/2009 (Torday, B.).
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE re 56 Settlement Agreement filed by Stefan Lepczynski, Theodore E. Storlazzi, Catherine Cox, James N. Parillo, ( Settlement Hearing set for 12/21/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom Two, 141 Church St., New Haven, CT before Judge Janet Bond Arterton). Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/7/09. (Torday, B.)
|
|
Filing
50
RULING AND ORDER: Defendant's 37 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The sole remaining matter for trial is Plaintiffs' LMRA claim that pre-2004 retirees are entitled to benefits under the Plan for the final ten months of the 2004 CBA. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 3/19/2009. (Padgett, G.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
