In Re: Peter J. Gould d/b/a Cherry Hill Dev. Co.
Appellee: Prologis Six Rivers Ltd Partnership
Appellant: Peter J. Gould
Case Number: 3:2007cv00591
Filed: April 17, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office
County: Fairfield
Presiding Judge: Warren W. Eginton
Presiding Judge: Holly B. Fitzsimmons
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 75 RULING affirming award by Bankruptcy Court. The Clerk is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 1/22/09. (Cepler, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Peter J. Gould d/b/a Cherry Hill Dev. Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Prologis Six Rivers Ltd Partnership
Represented By: Michael J. Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Peter J. Gould
Represented By: Thomas J. Romans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?