El Badrawi v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Rashad Ahmad Refaat El Badrawi |
Department of Homeland Security and Gregory Manack |
3:2007cv01074 |
July 13, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
New Haven |
Janet C. Hall |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 431 PUBLIC VERSION of RULING re 424 Sealed Order denying 348 MOTION for Summary Judgment, granting in part denying in part 374 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment, denying MOTION to Strike. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/11/2011. (Simpson, T.) |
Filing 204 RULING denying 180 Motion to Amend 159 Order on Motion for Protective Order, 139 Protective Order. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/29/09. (Simpson, T.) |
Filing 181 RULING denying 167 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/4/09. (Simpson, T.) |
Filing 164 RULING ORDER granting in part and denying in part 107 Motion to Compel. The Defendant United States of America shall disclose the redacted documents to plaintiff's attorneys by August 10, 2009. The redacted documents shall be designated "Protected Documents" per the court's Protective Order Doc. Nos. 139 , 159 . Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/24/09. (Jaiman, R.) Modified on 7/31/2009 (Jaiman, R.). |
Filing 159 ORDER granting in part 157 Motion for Protective Order. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/13/2009. (Joseloff, B.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.