Leftridge v. Connecticut State Trooper et al
| Vernon Leftridge |
| Connecticut State Trooper, Dept of Public Safety, Connecticut State Police Internal Affairs Unit and Connecticut State Police |
| 3:2007cv01166 |
| July 31, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New London |
| Vanessa L. Bryant |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
378
ORDER denying 361 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 365 Motion for Order; granting in part and denying in part 367 Motion to Compel; denying 367 Motion to Dismiss; denying 375 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 376 Motion for Order; granting in part and denying in part 376 Motion to Take Deposition. See attached Order. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Smith on June 5, 2012. (Slitt, M.)
|
|
Filing
295
ORDER denying 275 Motion to Compel Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 276 Motion for Order; granting in part and denying in part 277 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 280 Motion for Contempt; denying 280 Motion for Sanctions; de nying 282 Motion for Order; denying 284 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 284 Motion for Permanent Injunction; denying 284 Motion for Sanctions; denying 287 Motion to Stay; denying 293 Motion for Order. See ATTACHED ORDER. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Smith on March 13, 2012. (Slitt, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
