Hunnicutt v. Lantz et al
| Carnell Hunnicutt |
| Theresa Lantz, Jeffrey McGill, Wayne Choinski, Michael Donahue, Neftali Rodriguez, Luis Colon, Brian Murphy and Michael LaJoie |
| 3:2007cv01422 |
| September 21, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Tolland |
| Janet C. Hall |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
BENCH RULING. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants on all counts. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 9/30/12. (Esposito, A.)
|
|
Filing
56
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS. denying 45 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 45 Motion for TRO; granting 51 Motion to Compel; denying 52 Motion for Sanctions; denying 53 Motion for TRO; denying 53 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 54 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 55 Motion. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/28/10. (Corriette, M.)
|
|
Filing
34
RULING Denying 10 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint; Denying 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time ; Granting 20 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time; Denying 22 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Entry 55(a); Granting 24 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time; Granting 28 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 2/6/2009. (D'Andrea, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
