Kruk v. Metropolitan Life Ins Co, Inc et al
Rita Kruk |
Metropolitan Life Ins Co, Inc and Pechiney Plastic Packaging Inc., |
3:2007cv01533 |
October 17, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Fairfield |
Peter C. Dorsey |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
No cause code entered |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT (see attached) - The Court grants 95 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend Judgment. The Court's Amended Final Judgment is attached. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 7/11/13. (Hornstein, A) |
Filing 94 JUDGMENT (see attached). Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Judgment (Doc. 93 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to dismiss the Complaint with prejudice and without costs, and to close the file. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on June 28, 2013. (Dorais, L.) |
Filing 82 RULING (see attached) granting in part Defendants' 56 61 Motions for Summary Judgment in that Defendants are adjudged to have lawfully terminated long term disability payments to Plaintiff Rita Kruk as of January 19, 2003. The case i s REMANDED IN PART to the parties, for further proceedings consistent with Part II.E. of the Ruling. Defendants are directed to file and serve a brief and affidavits addressing the questions posed in Part II.E. of this Ruling on or before March 2 9, 2013. Plaintiff is directed to file and serve her responsive papers on or before April 12, 2013. A final judgment will be entered following the parties' filing of the aforementioned submissions and the Court's resolution of the issues discussed in Part II.E. of this Ruling. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 13, 2013. (Dorais, L.) |
Filing 52 RULING AND ORDER on 45 Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion To Compel: See attached document (16 pages). The motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. MetLife must produce relevant portions of its Claims Management Guidelines within 30 days o f this Order. The request for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b) is DENIED. Likewise, the motion to extend the discovery period to permit further depositions is DENIED. Dispositive motions must be filed by Aug. 10, 2010. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on May 27, 2010. (Kleysteuber, R.) (S-Kleysteuber, R.). |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Compliance. See attached document. Defendants shall respond or make the relevant individuals available for deposition (to the e xtent such individuals are within their control) within thirty (30) days of this Order, on or before June 25, 2009. Dispositive motions must be filed within forty-five (45) days thereafter, on or before August 9, 2009. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 26, 2009. (Kleysteuber, R.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.