Heusser et al v. Hale
| Frank Heusser, Sr. and Frank Heusser, Jr. |
| Kevin J. Hale |
| 3:2007cv01660 |
| November 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Peter C. Dorsey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 66 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. (See attached Ruling.) Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on November 12, 2009. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 34 Defendants' Motion to Strike. (See attached Ruling.) Plaintiffs are ordered to modify the May 8, 2008 complaint filed in 3:08-cv-708(PCD), and subsequently made controlling in this case after the consolidation, by removing t he statements that have been stricken, which are identified in detail in Defendants' motion. Plaintiffs are ordered to docket the complaint as so amended, and without making any other changes to it, on or before October 23, 2009 in 3:07-cv-1660(CSH) only. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on October 19, 2009. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER denying 56 Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order. (See attached.) The Court orders Plaintiffs to attend the deposition on October 21, 2009 at 11 AM in Stamford as noticed. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on October 13, 2009. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
