Gooden v. Connecticut Dept of Corr
Plaintiff: Courtney Gooden
Defendant: Connecticut Dept of Corr
Case Number: 3:2007cv01859
Filed: December 18, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New London
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Chatigny
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: Family & Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's federal claim is dismissed with prejudice and plaintiff's state law claim is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 02/12/2010. (Swan, N.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gooden v. Connecticut Dept of Corr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtney Gooden
Represented By: John R. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Connecticut Dept of Corr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?