Arrigoni Ent LLC v. Durham et al
Arrigoni Ent LLC |
Town of Durham, Durham Planning & Zoning Comm and Durham Zoning Bd of Appeals |
3:2008cv00520 |
April 8, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Middlesex |
Alvin W. Thompson |
Civil Rights: Other |
No cause code entered |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 172 ORDER re final judgment. Signed by James Carr on 1/29/13.(Constantine, A.) |
Filing 168 Amended ORDER re 161 Order Signed by James Carr on 1/15/13.(Ruocco, M.) |
Filing 147 ORDER : See attached order. Counsel are to submit Joint Trial Memorandum on or before December 17, 2012. Final pretrial conference scheduled Thursday, January 3, 2013, at noon, is to be by telephone. Counsel are to call into the court bridge line at 419-213-5509; pass code is 550911. Signed by James Carr on 12/11/12. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 145 ORDER & CALENDAR: See attached order. A telephonic status conference is scheduled for Tuesday 12/11/2012 at 10:00 a.m. with Judge Carr. Counsel are to call into the court bridge line at 419-213-5509; passcode is 550911. Signed by James Carr on 12/3/12. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 94 ORDER: Cross Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 65 & 70 ) are hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 09/30/11. (Atmeh, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.