Cadena et al v. A-E Contracting LLC et al
| Edwin Cadena, Fernando Casano, Rodolfo Rivera, Luis Alberto Flores and Roman Aguire |
| A-E Contracting LLC and Akbar Etermadfar |
| 3:2008cv00574 |
| April 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Labor: Fair Standards Office |
| Hartford |
| Warren W. Eginton |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
RECOMMENDED RULING granting 187 Motion amend recommended ruling, granting 173 , denying 130 , denying 134 , denying 150 , denying 131 , denying 183 . Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 7/7/16. (Gould, K.) Modified event type on 7/7/2016 (Gould, K.).
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER denying 130 Motion to Dismiss; denying 131 Motion for Order; denying 134 Motion ; denying 150 Motion to Dismiss; denying 150 Motion for Order; granting 173 Motion ; denying 183 Motion for Order. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 6/22/16. (Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER re 125 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 8/17/15.(Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
|
Filing
89
RULING Granting 81 MOTION to Appoint Receiver of Rents filed by Luis Alberto Flores, Edwin Cadena, Roman Aguire, Rodolfo Rivera, Fernando Casano. 6 pages. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 11/21/13.(Esposito, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
