Wu et al v. Changs Garden of Storrs LLC et al
| Bing Wu, Feng Chun Guan, Tina Wang, Gui Bin Cai, Jun Zhang, Quin Ping Yuan, Jin Lu Ma and Zhen Hai He |
| Changs Garden of Storrs LLC, Le Shih Chang, Hsiang I. Chang and Wei-Wei Chang |
| 3:2008cv00746 |
| May 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Labor: Fair Standards Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Warren W. Eginton |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
242
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION - DENYING 208 Motion for Summary Judgment and 226 Motion for Summary Judgment as to the FLSA and Connecticut Minimum Wage Act claims against Hsiang I Chang and GRANTING as to all other claims against Hsiang I Chang and Wei Wei Chang. Plaintiffs are instructed to amend their complaint consistent with this ruling within five days of this ruling's filing date. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 3/10/2010. (Candee, D.)
|
|
Filing
200
MEMORANDUM of DECISION denying 104 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 105 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 106 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 107 Motion to Strike. Plaintiffs are instructed to file an amended complaint to remove paragraph 36 consistent with this ruling within 10 days of this ruling's filing date. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 11/10/2009. (Simpson, T.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
