Jarry v. Southington Bd of Ed et al
Plaintiff Marie Jarry requested a sick day to appear on the Howard Stern Show in the "hottest wife, ugliest husband" contest. Plaintiff alleged that Defendants coerced her to resign in lieu of termination for breaching a morality clause.
| Marie Jarry |
| Southington Bd of Ed, Southington Ed Assn and Joseph V. Erardi, Jr. |
| 3:2008cv00954 |
| June 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Hartford |
| Warren W. Eginton |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION re 59 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Christopher Hankins, Connecticut Education Association Incorporated, Southington Ed Assn. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 7/7/2010. (Heard, J.)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION granting 59 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 7/7/2010. (Heard, J.)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying 32 Motion for More Definite Statement; granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 1/22/2008. (Heard, J.)
|
|
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against Southington Bd of Ed, Southington Ed Assn, Joseph V. Erardi, Jr ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number H025867), filed by Marie Jarry.(Ferguson, L.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
