Muhmmaud v. Murphy et al
| Saleem Muhmmaud |
| Brian Murphy, Mary Marcial, Dennis Jones, Wayne Choinsky, Fred Levesque, Ellen St John, Rose, Light, Rodriguez, Dennis Oglesby, Jeffrey McGill, Brown, McEwan, Yolanda Ortero, John Siminski, Travaglin, James Dzurenda and McLeod |
| 3:2008cv01199 |
| August 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Tolland |
| Vanessa L. Bryant |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER denying 53 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 73 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. See the attached Memorandum of Decision. 78 Plaintiff's Motion to Address the Issues, [ 82] Plaintiff's Motion for Court Consideration, and 83 Plaintiff's Motion to Enter New Information are GRANTED. The Court has reviewed all documents submitted by Plaintiff in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment. 79 Plaintiff' ;s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED because the Court did not dismiss Plaintiff's failure to protect claim. A separate Order shall issue scheduling this case for trial on the Plaintiff's substantive due process and failure to protect claims. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 11/19/09. (Engel, J.)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion to Dismiss. See the attached ruling. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 6/30/09. (Wilson, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
