Lord et al v. Intl Marine Ins Svcs et al
| Franklin Lord and Sharon Schumann |
| Intl Marine Ins Svcs, Intl Marine Underwriters, Patricia Fitti, Eleanor J. Matson, Alan Golden and Gary Golden |
| 3:2008cv01299 |
| August 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New London |
| Alan H. Nevas |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
RULING denying 165 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 167 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court grants summary judgment for IMU on plaintiffs four claims and denies, as moot, summary judgment on IMUs cross-claims for indemnification and setoff. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/23/13. (Pesta, J.)
|
|
Filing
164
RULING denying 133 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/10/2013. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing
153
RULING taking under advisement 133 Motion for Sanctions; denying 134 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/18/2013. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing
69
AMENDED RULING granting 66 MOTION to Strike 65 Amended Complaint filed by Intl Marine Ins Svcs, Gary Golden, Alan Golden. Further, plaintiffs are hereby ordered to show cause why the court should not strike their claims for violations of CUTPA and fraudulent concealment by Monday, January 30, 2012. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/9/2012. (Oliver, T.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
