O'Brien v. State of CT Dept of Labor et al
| Vera O'Brien |
| State of CT Dept of Labor, Dwayne Miller, Bob Kelsey, Mark Pozella, Joe Barra, Thomas Donlan and AFSCME Council 4 |
| 3:2008cv01466 |
| September 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| New Haven |
| Robert N. Chatigny |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
255
ORDER : A settlement conference is set for 11/1/2013 at 1:00 PM in Chambers Room 262, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Donna F. Martinez. By 10/28/13, counsel shall submit to chambers a draft settlement agreement and a joint status report listing the agreed upon terms and identifying any remaining areas of disagreement. See attached order. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 9/9/13.(Constantine, A.)
|
|
Filing
240
ORDER: A settlement conference is scheduled for 7/18/2013 at 1:00 PM in Chambers Room 262, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Donna F. Martinez. Please see attached order for important instructions. (Constantine, A.)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER granting 99 Joint Motion for Protective Order. See attached ruling. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 11/18/09. (Constantine, A.)
|
|
Filing
90
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert N. Chatigny: Motion Hearing held on 10/5/2009 re 40 MOTION to Dismiss filed by AFSCME Council 4, 83 MOTION for Protective Order filed by AFSCME Council 4, 70 Third MOTION for Extension of Ti me to File Response/Reply as to 83 Motion for Protective Order. Oral order granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 70 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re: 83 MOTION for Protective Order, denying as moot 83 Motion for Protective Order. Total Time: 1 hours and 35 minutes(Court Reporter Darlene Warner.) (Walker, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
