Pierce v. Lee
Petitioner: William D. Pierce
Respondent: Charles Lee
Case Number: 3:2008cv01721
Filed: November 13, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Fairfield
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L. Bryant
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 PRISCS - RULING. denying 34 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 34 Motion to Amend. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 11/3/10. (Corriette, M.)
May 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 PRISCS - ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 5/21/10. (Corriette, M.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pierce v. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William D. Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charles Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?