Jeunes v. National Rural Letter Carriers' Assoc
Plaintiff: Josier F. Jeunes
Defendant: National Rural Letter Carriers' Assoc
Case Number: 3:2009cv00280
Filed: February 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: Labor: Other Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Peter C. Dorsey
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:151 Labor: Review of Agency Action

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 RULING granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Peter C. Dorsey on 7-2-10. (Miller, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jeunes v. National Rural Letter Carriers' Assoc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Josier F. Jeunes
Represented By: John R. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Rural Letter Carriers' Assoc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?