Cronin v. Berger Lehman Assoc PC
Plaintiff: Eamon Cronin
Defendant: Berger Lehman Assoc PC
Case Number: 3:2009cv00716
Filed: May 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Warren W. Eginton
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM of DECISION denying 14 Motion to Remand to State Court. Defendant is instructed to amend the removal papers within ten days of this ruling's filing date. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 6/18/09. (Simpson, T.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cronin v. Berger Lehman Assoc PC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eamon Cronin
Represented By: Maurice T. Fitzmaurice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Berger Lehman Assoc PC
Represented By: Louis R. Satriale, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?