Doe v. University of Hartford
| John Doe |
| University of Hartford |
| 3:2009cv01071 |
| July 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Windham |
| Warren W. Eginton |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
179
RULING: denying, without prejudice as moot 173 Motion to Compel; denying, without prejudice to renew at the end of this litigation 173 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 8/26/2013. (Rodko, B.)
|
|
Filing
175
RULING ON MULTIPLE MOTIONS IN LIMINE: denying without prejudice as moot 120 Motion re: Preparation for Trial Testimony of Plaintiff's State of CT Judicial Branch Adult Probation Officer; denying 122 Motion for Protective Order; deny ing without prejudice as moot 130 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice as moot 133 Motion in Limine; denying in large part to the extent set forth in Section I.A.3, 135 Motion in Limine; denying 140 Motion in Limine; denying in lar ge part to the extent set forth in Section 1.A.2 142 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice as moot with respect to Mary Smith and denying without prejudice to renew, if necessary, with respect to John Smith 143 Motion in Limine; denying [ 148] Motion in Limine; granting 149 Motion in Limine; denying 150 Motion in Limine; granting 152 Motion in Limine; granting with respect to plaintiff's termination but denying with respect to Social Security Disability Benefits 153 Motion in Limine.Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 8/22/2013. (Rodko, B.)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER granting 96 MOTION for Reconsideration re 91 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment and adhering to the Court's previous decision denying defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's discrimination claim. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 11/30/12. (Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 73 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to plaintiff's retaliation claim. Defendants motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to plaintiff's discrimination claim. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 10/25/12. (Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion for Protective Order. See attached ruling. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 1/4/2012. (Garcia, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe v. University of Hartford | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Doe | |
| Represented By: | Barbara E. Gardner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: University of Hartford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
