Campos v. Zopounidis et al
Jamie Campos |
Ecdoxia Zopounidis and EZ Ent LLC |
3:2009cv01138 |
July 20, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Fairfield |
Vanessa L. Bryant |
Plaintiff |
29 U.S.C. ยง 203 Equal Pay Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER granting 57 Motion in Limine regarding Immigration Status; granting 58 Motion in Limine regarding evidence of Tip Income; denying 80 Motion to Amend/Correct Joint Trial Memorandum to add two of Plaintiff's current employers to the li st of Defendant's trial witnesses. See the attached Memorandum of Decision. The Parties are directed to review this Memorandum of Decision in advance of the Telephonic Pretrial Conference on 10/17/11. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/13/11. (Hildebrand, J.) |
Filing 51 ORDER granting 45 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. See the attached Memorandum of Decision. For the reasons explained in the attached Memorandum, The Court holds that the Plaintiff was an employee of the Defendants rather than an independent contractor, and therefore that he may avail himself of the FLSA's protections in this lawsuit. This case will proceed to trial in accordance with the Court's September 7, 2010 Scheduling Order [Doc. #39], pursuant to which the Joint Trial Memorandum is due by 8/15/11 and Jury Selection shall take place on 10/4/11 at 9:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 7/20/11. (Engel, J.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.