Young v. McGill et al
| Cedric Young |
| Jeffrey McGill, Valerie Light, Brian Hicock, David Newritter, Linda Reichler, Cuevas and Carol |
| 3:2009cv01205 |
| July 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Tolland |
| Charles S. Haight, Jr. |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER granting 49 Motion for Reconsideration. On reconsideration, the Court adheres to its denial of summary judgment against the claims made against defendants Newritter and Cuevas. However, the Court grants summary judgment against the claims against defendant Reichler. See attached Ruling. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on February 8, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
|
Filing
46
RULING granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on December 8, 2011. (Wilson, D.)
|
|
Filing
32
RULING denying 28 Motion to Compel and for sanctions. Signed by Judge Ellen Bree Burns on November 10, 2010. (Wilson, D.)
|
|
Filing
10
PRISCS - INITIAL REVIEW ORDER: See attached document. Plaintiff's 7 Motion To Amend is GRANTED, and his proposed Third Amended Complaint shall be docketed as the operative complaint in this case. His previous 4 and 5 Motions To Amend are DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's 3 Motion To Appoint Counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal at a later stage in this litigation. The Pro Se Prisoner Litigation Office shall mail waiver of service of process request p ackets to each defendant in his or her individual capacity on or before March 16, 2010, and report to the court on the status of those waiver requests on or before April 6, 2010. The Pro Se Prisoner Litigation Office shall enable the U.S. Marshal to effect service of the complaint on the defendants in their official capacities at the office of the Connecticut Attorney General on or before March 16, 2010, and file returns of service on or before March 22, 2010. Defendants shall file their respon se to the Third Amended Complaint on or before April 2, 2010. If they choose to file an answer, they shall admit or deny the allegations and respond to the cognizable claims recited above. They also may include any and all additional defenses permi tted by the Federal Rules. Discovery shall be completed by September 28, 2010. Discovery requests need not be filed with the court. All motions for summary judgment shall be filed on or before October 28, 2010. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 2, 2010. (Kleysteuber, R.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
